Earlier this week, on Monday, November 17, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2803, a US-drafted plan aimed at rebuilding Gaza. However, it immediately drew fire from China and Russia, both of whom abstained and criticized the text as “vague and unclear.” 😕
China’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, told the Council the draft is too thin on details about the proposed Board of Peace and the international stabilization force (ISF). “It should have explained their structure, composition, and participation criteria,” he said. 🚨
Russia echoed these concerns, questioning how the ISF would operate on the ground and guide postwar governance.
Gaza’s Hamas rulers also slammed the resolution, arguing it ignores Palestinian rights and imposes an unwanted trusteeship on the territory. They reject the idea of an international force that could disarm local groups. ⚔️
So, what’s in Resolution 2803? It welcomes a transitional Board of Peace to coordinate Gaza’s redevelopment and endorses a temporary ISF under UN command. This force would have the mandate to use “all necessary measures” to maintain security until the Palestinian Authority completes reforms and resumes control.
The debate over Resolution 2803 shows that rebuilding Gaza is about more than bricks and mortar—it’s a high-stakes diplomatic puzzle. As Gaza enters its critical post-conflict phase, these international clashes will determine its future path. 🌐🤝
Reference(s):
China, Russia criticize US-drafted, UN-adopted Gaza resolution
cgtn.com
