In a striking reminder of technology's double-edged sword, a UK judge has warned lawyers about using fake AI-generated cases in court! ⚖️🤖
High Court justice Victoria Sharp, alongside judge Jeremy Johnson, recently highlighted two incidents where attorneys cited cases that never existed. In one instance, during a 90-million-pound lawsuit involving Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 entirely fabricated cases. In another case related to a tenant's housing claim in London, five non-existent cases were used in legal arguments.
The judges have referred these matters to the relevant professional regulators, stressing that misusing AI not only risks misleading the court but also undermines public confidence in the justice system. They warned that presenting false material as genuine evidence might even lead to serious charges, including contempt of court or perverting the course of justice in extreme scenarios.
While acknowledging that AI is a powerful and useful tool, the ruling serves as a wake-up call in our fast-paced, tech-driven world: always verify your sources and ensure accuracy when using digital aids. This is a reminder for everyone, in and out of the courtroom, to check the facts before hitting 'send'! 🔍
Reference(s):
UK judge warns of risk after lawyers cite fake AI-generated cases
cgtn.com
