With over 150 executive orders in just four months, President Trump has ignited a fierce debate about the limits of executive power. A fresh Q&A session with leading scholars brought some hard-hitting insights into whether Congress and the courts remain effective checks on the presidency.
Political science expert Mitchel Sollenberger points to growing partisanship in Congress. He explains that when both sides stick too closely to party lines, it weakens lawmakers' ability to hold the executive accountable. As a result, tools like impeachment have lost some of their bite, leaving the branch with fewer institutional brakes.
Meanwhile, law and economics professor David Super highlights a shift in judicial deference. Historically, courts assumed that presidential actions were lawful and that the administration was honest. However, with Trump’s aggressive approach, judges have become increasingly cautious about directly challenging the executive—fearing a loss of credibility if their rulings are defied.
Together, the experts warn that ignoring judicial rulings could fuel a constitutional crisis—where the fundamental balance of power breaks down. This conversation not only underscores the challenges in today's political landscape but also sparks a broader debate about updating constitutional norms to fit modern governance. 🤔🔥
As the U.S. navigates this unfolding power struggle, the discussion remains essential for young professionals, students, and political enthusiasts eager to understand the forces shaping their future.
Reference(s):
Q&A: Can Congress, courts check Trump's executive powers? (Part Two)
cgtn.com
