America’s strength isn’t measured by flashy words but by the expertise of those steering the ship. In recent times, Washington has seen a puzzling trend: an administration that prizes unwavering loyalty over proven competence. This shift, critics argue, risks corroding the very foundations of effective governance. 😮
One incident that sent ripples through political circles involved a high-ranking official mistakenly adding Jeffrey Goldberg to a secret Signal group discussing a planned military strike on the Houthis. What might have looked like a simple mix-up turned into a stark example of how loyalty – not professional excellence – now appears to be the key qualification for critical roles.
In earlier days, Washington still had career professionals, decorated generals, and seasoned experts ensuring that nuanced decisions were made in the best interest of the nation. Today, however, the landscape has changed. Figures known more for their media presence or ideology than for technical know-how are being entrusted with enormous responsibilities. For instance, a former media personality now leads the Department of Defense, an operation worth billions, while another well-known figure with controversial views is overseeing national health policy.
It’s like casting a reality show star to helm a blockbuster production – the mismatch of skills becomes hard to ignore. As appointments based solely on unwavering support pile up, many wonder if this trend might not only stifle sound decision-making but also put America at a disadvantage on a global stage. 🚀
As the nation faces increasingly complex challenges, the call for skilled, knowledgeable leaders grows louder. The current scenario serves as a cautionary tale: when loyalty overshadows expertise, the price of political alignment can be steep, and the future of governance hangs in the balance.
Reference(s):
The cost of loyalty: How Trump's inner circle is undermining America
cgtn.com
