Study Finds Carbon Removal Can’t Save Us If We Miss 1.5°C Warming Target

Hey there, climate warriors! 🌎✨ We've got some urgent news that might make you rethink the future of our planet. A recent study published in the journal Nature reveals that even ramping up efforts to remove carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere won't avert a climate catastrophe if global temperatures soar past the critical 1.5°C threshold. 😱

You might be wondering, \"Wait, isn't carbon removal supposed to be our ace in the hole?\" Well, not quite. According to scientists, relying solely on carbon removal techniques won't cut it. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner from Austria's International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis warns, \"Even if you've brought temperatures back down again, the world we will be looking at will not be the same.\"

Here's the deal: Exceeding the 1.5°C target triggers irreversible changes in our climate system, like rising sea levels 🌊, melting permafrost ❄️, and altered ocean circulation 🌊. These changes can't be undone just by sucking CO₂ out of the air. Plus, as the permafrost melts and peatlands shrink, they release methane—a super-potent greenhouse gas—causing even more warming! 🔥

Joeri Rogelj of Imperial College London points out that even the most ambitious scenarios factor in a slight overshoot of the 1.5°C mark. To reverse a 0.1°C overshoot, we'd need to remove about 220 billion tons of CO₂. A 0.5°C overshoot? Over a trillion tons! That's like trying to bail out the ocean with a teaspoon! 🥄🌊

Currently, our global carbon dioxide removal (CDR) capacity is around 2 billion tons per year. To meet climate goals, we'd need to scale that up to 7-9 billion tons annually. But there are challenges. We can only plant so many trees 🌳, and current technologies to capture CO₂ are expensive and energy-intensive. Plus, dedicating land purely for carbon management can conflict with biodiversity and food production. 🍽️🌿

So, what's the takeaway? We can't bank on carbon removal to save us if we let global temperatures rise unchecked. \"Only through ambitious emissions reductions in the near term can we effectively reduce the risks from climate change,\" Rogelj emphasizes. It's time to double down on cutting emissions and transition to sustainable energy sources. Let's get moving! 🚀🌱

Reference(s):

Carbon removal no solution if world misses warming target, study finds

cgtn.com